-
All Events
IAO-EAO-SIdP joint meeting 2024EAO-DGI joint meeting 202329th Annual Scientific CongressEAO Digital Days 2021EAO Digital Days 202028th Annual Scientific Congress27th Annual Scientific Congress26th Annual Scientific Congress25th Annual Scientific Congress24th Annual Scientific Congress23rd Annual Scientific Congress -
All Content TypesAbstractArticle ReviewePosterLearning moduleLearning QuizMatching SlidePDF DocumentWebcast
-
Sort ByRelevance
Background:
Soft tissue recessions frequently cause esthetic disharmony and dissatisfaction. A major concern is the appearance of soft tissue dehiscence in the facial aspect, common finding following implant restorations.
Aim/Hypothesis:
The aim of the case was to evaluate the soft-tissue coverage around single dental implant and patient aesthetic satisfaction 1 year after the final restoration.
Material and Methods:
The patient was a 31-year-old male who visited our clinic with a chief complaint of esthetic dissatisfaction in the exposed implant of the maxillary lateral incisors. There were 4 mm and 2 mm abutment exposure in the buccal mucosa around the implant of the maxillary left and right lateral incisors, respectively. Treatment consisted in: removal of the implant supported crown, coronally advanced flap in combination with connective tissue graft and final restoration.
Results:
One-year after surgery, the soft tissue margin was stable and the esthetic appearance of the implant site was well maintained. The soft tissue dehiscence defect coverage was 100%.
Conclusions and clinical implications:
This case report has shown that a bilaminar technique approach may result in improved conditions of the peri-implant soft tissue and the suggested prosthetic-surgical procedure was aesthetically successful.
Background:
Soft tissue recessions frequently cause esthetic disharmony and dissatisfaction. A major concern is the appearance of soft tissue dehiscence in the facial aspect, common finding following implant restorations.
Aim/Hypothesis:
The aim of the case was to evaluate the soft-tissue coverage around single dental implant and patient aesthetic satisfaction 1 year after the final restoration.
Material and Methods:
The patient was a 31-year-old male who visited our clinic with a chief complaint of esthetic dissatisfaction in the exposed implant of the maxillary lateral incisors. There were 4 mm and 2 mm abutment exposure in the buccal mucosa around the implant of the maxillary left and right lateral incisors, respectively. Treatment consisted in: removal of the implant supported crown, coronally advanced flap in combination with connective tissue graft and final restoration.
Results:
One-year after surgery, the soft tissue margin was stable and the esthetic appearance of the implant site was well maintained. The soft tissue dehiscence defect coverage was 100%.
Conclusions and clinical implications:
This case report has shown that a bilaminar technique approach may result in improved conditions of the peri-implant soft tissue and the suggested prosthetic-surgical procedure was aesthetically successful.
Background:
Soft tissue recessions frequently cause esthetic disharmony and dissatisfaction. A major concern is the appearance of soft tissue dehiscence in the facial aspect, common finding following implant restorations.
Aim/Hypothesis:
The aim of the case was to evaluate the soft-tissue coverage around single dental implant and patient aesthetic satisfaction 1 year after the final restoration.
Material and Methods:
The patient was a 31-year-old male who visited our clinic with a chief complaint of esthetic dissatisfaction in the exposed implant of the maxillary lateral incisors. There were 4 mm and 2 mm abutment exposure in the buccal mucosa around the implant of the maxillary left and right lateral incisors, respectively. Treatment consisted in: removal of the implant supported crown, coronally advanced flap in combination with connective tissue graft and final restoration.
Results:
One-year after surgery, the soft tissue margin was stable and the esthetic appearance of the implant site was well maintained. The soft tissue dehiscence defect coverage was 100%.
Conclusions and clinical implications:
This case report has shown that a bilaminar technique approach may result in improved conditions of the peri-implant soft tissue and the suggested prosthetic-surgical procedure was aesthetically successful.
Background:
Soft tissue recessions frequently cause esthetic disharmony and dissatisfaction. A major concern is the appearance of soft tissue dehiscence in the facial aspect, common finding following implant restorations.
Aim/Hypothesis:
The aim of the case was to evaluate the soft-tissue coverage around single dental implant and patient aesthetic satisfaction 1 year after the final restoration.
Material and Methods:
The patient was a 31-year-old male who visited our clinic with a chief complaint of esthetic dissatisfaction in the exposed implant of the maxillary lateral incisors. There were 4 mm and 2 mm abutment exposure in the buccal mucosa around the implant of the maxillary left and right lateral incisors, respectively. Treatment consisted in: removal of the implant supported crown, coronally advanced flap in combination with connective tissue graft and final restoration.
Results:
One-year after surgery, the soft tissue margin was stable and the esthetic appearance of the implant site was well maintained. The soft tissue dehiscence defect coverage was 100%.
Conclusions and clinical implications:
This case report has shown that a bilaminar technique approach may result in improved conditions of the peri-implant soft tissue and the suggested prosthetic-surgical procedure was aesthetically successful.