-
All Events
IAO-EAO-SIdP joint meeting 2024EAO-DGI joint meeting 202329th Annual Scientific CongressEAO Digital Days 2021EAO Digital Days 202028th Annual Scientific Congress27th Annual Scientific Congress26th Annual Scientific Congress25th Annual Scientific Congress24th Annual Scientific Congress23rd Annual Scientific Congress -
All Content TypesAbstractArticle ReviewePosterLearning moduleLearning QuizMatching SlidePDF DocumentWebcast
-
Sort ByRelevance
Background
here are many reports about the incidence of peri-implant disease, including consensus reports or systematic reviews. However, of course these serve as a reference, these reports based on the deferent technique, materials and race. In particular, it is thought that race affect the incidence of peri-implant disease.
Aim/Hypothesis
The aim of this present study was to evaluate the peri-implant tissue in general dental office in Japan.
Material and Methods
170 patients (female:101, male:69,) who had attended follow-up visit between 2013 January to December were evaluated. The condition of peri-implant tissue were evaluated by original evaluation form about clinical symptoms including swelling PPD, BOP, pus discharge etc. Each evaluation item has marks (1 point -11 point) and categorized to healthy, peri-implant mucositis and implantitis based on total marks.
Results
652 implants were evaluated in this study. In implant revel, the incidence of peri-implantitis was 5% and peri-implant mucositis was 7%. In subject revel, 7% and 46%, respectively. In addition, the incidence of peri-implant mucositis and implantitis were increase in patients who had experienced periodontal disease (12%, 53%) compared to other patients.
Conclusions and clinical implications
In this limited study, the incidence of peri-implant disease are slightly low compared to previous reports. However, these data were based on original evaluation form. In addition, we could not be evaluate adding other factors such as shape of superstructure, bone condition at pre surgical period. On the other hand, patients who had experienced periodontal disease liable to be develop the peri-implant disease. This tendency accords in past reports, therefore, it seems that control of periodontal disease is required.
Background
here are many reports about the incidence of peri-implant disease, including consensus reports or systematic reviews. However, of course these serve as a reference, these reports based on the deferent technique, materials and race. In particular, it is thought that race affect the incidence of peri-implant disease.
Aim/Hypothesis
The aim of this present study was to evaluate the peri-implant tissue in general dental office in Japan.
Material and Methods
170 patients (female:101, male:69,) who had attended follow-up visit between 2013 January to December were evaluated. The condition of peri-implant tissue were evaluated by original evaluation form about clinical symptoms including swelling PPD, BOP, pus discharge etc. Each evaluation item has marks (1 point -11 point) and categorized to healthy, peri-implant mucositis and implantitis based on total marks.
Results
652 implants were evaluated in this study. In implant revel, the incidence of peri-implantitis was 5% and peri-implant mucositis was 7%. In subject revel, 7% and 46%, respectively. In addition, the incidence of peri-implant mucositis and implantitis were increase in patients who had experienced periodontal disease (12%, 53%) compared to other patients.
Conclusions and clinical implications
In this limited study, the incidence of peri-implant disease are slightly low compared to previous reports. However, these data were based on original evaluation form. In addition, we could not be evaluate adding other factors such as shape of superstructure, bone condition at pre surgical period. On the other hand, patients who had experienced periodontal disease liable to be develop the peri-implant disease. This tendency accords in past reports, therefore, it seems that control of periodontal disease is required.
Background
here are many reports about the incidence of peri-implant disease, including consensus reports or systematic reviews. However, of course these serve as a reference, these reports based on the deferent technique, materials and race. In particular, it is thought that race affect the incidence of peri-implant disease.
Aim/Hypothesis
The aim of this present study was to evaluate the peri-implant tissue in general dental office in Japan.
Material and Methods
170 patients (female:101, male:69,) who had attended follow-up visit between 2013 January to December were evaluated. The condition of peri-implant tissue were evaluated by original evaluation form about clinical symptoms including swelling PPD, BOP, pus discharge etc. Each evaluation item has marks (1 point -11 point) and categorized to healthy, peri-implant mucositis and implantitis based on total marks.
Results
652 implants were evaluated in this study. In implant revel, the incidence of peri-implantitis was 5% and peri-implant mucositis was 7%. In subject revel, 7% and 46%, respectively. In addition, the incidence of peri-implant mucositis and implantitis were increase in patients who had experienced periodontal disease (12%, 53%) compared to other patients.
Conclusions and clinical implications
In this limited study, the incidence of peri-implant disease are slightly low compared to previous reports. However, these data were based on original evaluation form. In addition, we could not be evaluate adding other factors such as shape of superstructure, bone condition at pre surgical period. On the other hand, patients who had experienced periodontal disease liable to be develop the peri-implant disease. This tendency accords in past reports, therefore, it seems that control of periodontal disease is required.
Background
here are many reports about the incidence of peri-implant disease, including consensus reports or systematic reviews. However, of course these serve as a reference, these reports based on the deferent technique, materials and race. In particular, it is thought that race affect the incidence of peri-implant disease.
Aim/Hypothesis
The aim of this present study was to evaluate the peri-implant tissue in general dental office in Japan.
Material and Methods
170 patients (female:101, male:69,) who had attended follow-up visit between 2013 January to December were evaluated. The condition of peri-implant tissue were evaluated by original evaluation form about clinical symptoms including swelling PPD, BOP, pus discharge etc. Each evaluation item has marks (1 point -11 point) and categorized to healthy, peri-implant mucositis and implantitis based on total marks.
Results
652 implants were evaluated in this study. In implant revel, the incidence of peri-implantitis was 5% and peri-implant mucositis was 7%. In subject revel, 7% and 46%, respectively. In addition, the incidence of peri-implant mucositis and implantitis were increase in patients who had experienced periodontal disease (12%, 53%) compared to other patients.
Conclusions and clinical implications
In this limited study, the incidence of peri-implant disease are slightly low compared to previous reports. However, these data were based on original evaluation form. In addition, we could not be evaluate adding other factors such as shape of superstructure, bone condition at pre surgical period. On the other hand, patients who had experienced periodontal disease liable to be develop the peri-implant disease. This tendency accords in past reports, therefore, it seems that control of periodontal disease is required.