-
All Events
IAO-EAO-SIdP joint meeting 2024EAO-DGI joint meeting 202329th Annual Scientific CongressEAO Digital Days 2021EAO Digital Days 202028th Annual Scientific Congress27th Annual Scientific Congress26th Annual Scientific Congress25th Annual Scientific Congress24th Annual Scientific Congress23rd Annual Scientific Congress -
All Content TypesAbstractArticle ReviewePosterLearning moduleLearning QuizMatching SlidePDF DocumentWebcast
-
Sort ByRelevance
Protected by US Patents
Login now to access Regular content available to all registered users.
Abstract
Discussion Forum (0)
<div style='text-align: justify;'>In the eighties one could only start to place Nobel Biocare implants after a 2-3 day surgical training. During such course following aspects received special attention: patient selection (minimal jawbone dimensions, optimal oral health, hip grafts…..), healed extraction sockets before implant placement ( 6 months), implant planning on 2D radiographs, correct number of implants/jaw, strong sterility conditions (complete nose coverage, double aspiration, pediculated oral flap, ….), a-traumatic surgery (low-speed drilling/implant placement, excessive water cooling, ….), submerged healing (3 or 6 months for lower/upper jaw, respectively), screw retained supra-structures, occlusion in resin. The protocol was strict and biocompatibility was crucial. Most implants at those days were minimally rough, primarily Grade 1 titanium, often with external hex without platform switch, 3.5 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length.This presentation will verify whether the most important modifications during the past 35 were beneficial from a biological point of view.</div>
<div style='text-align: justify;'>In the eighties one could only start to place Nobel Biocare implants after a 2-3 day surgical training. During such course following aspects received special attention: patient selection (minimal jawbone dimensions, optimal oral health, hip grafts…..), healed extraction sockets before implant placement ( 6 months), implant planning on 2D radiographs, correct number of implants/jaw, strong sterility conditions (complete nose coverage, double aspiration, pediculated oral flap, ….), a-traumatic surgery (low-speed drilling/implant placement, excessive water cooling, ….), submerged healing (3 or 6 months for lower/upper jaw, respectively), screw retained supra-structures, occlusion in resin. The protocol was strict and biocompatibility was crucial. Most implants at those days were minimally rough, primarily Grade 1 titanium, often with external hex without platform switch, 3.5 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length.This presentation will verify whether the most important modifications during the past 35 were beneficial from a biological point of view.</div>
The Brånemark legacy, the conservative approach
Marc Quirynen
Abstract
Discussion Forum (0)
<div style='text-align: justify;'>In the eighties one could only start to place Nobel Biocare implants after a 2-3 day surgical training. During such course following aspects received special attention: patient selection (minimal jawbone dimensions, optimal oral health, hip grafts…..), healed extraction sockets before implant placement ( 6 months), implant planning on 2D radiographs, correct number of implants/jaw, strong sterility conditions (complete nose coverage, double aspiration, pediculated oral flap, ….), a-traumatic surgery (low-speed drilling/implant placement, excessive water cooling, ….), submerged healing (3 or 6 months for lower/upper jaw, respectively), screw retained supra-structures, occlusion in resin. The protocol was strict and biocompatibility was crucial. Most implants at those days were minimally rough, primarily Grade 1 titanium, often with external hex without platform switch, 3.5 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length.This presentation will verify whether the most important modifications during the past 35 were beneficial from a biological point of view.</div>
<div style='text-align: justify;'>In the eighties one could only start to place Nobel Biocare implants after a 2-3 day surgical training. During such course following aspects received special attention: patient selection (minimal jawbone dimensions, optimal oral health, hip grafts…..), healed extraction sockets before implant placement ( 6 months), implant planning on 2D radiographs, correct number of implants/jaw, strong sterility conditions (complete nose coverage, double aspiration, pediculated oral flap, ….), a-traumatic surgery (low-speed drilling/implant placement, excessive water cooling, ….), submerged healing (3 or 6 months for lower/upper jaw, respectively), screw retained supra-structures, occlusion in resin. The protocol was strict and biocompatibility was crucial. Most implants at those days were minimally rough, primarily Grade 1 titanium, often with external hex without platform switch, 3.5 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length.This presentation will verify whether the most important modifications during the past 35 were beneficial from a biological point of view.</div>
{{ help_message }}
{{filter}}